Answered

Seller’s agent Pam failed to discover that the heating system of a home she had listed was defective. She sold the property and several months later the buyer sued Pam for not disclosing the problem. Which statement is true?
a. The buyer was responsible for making that discovery; so Pam is not liable.
b. Pam is not liable since it was summer and the heating problem was not obvious.
c. The seller did not disclose the problem on a seller’s disclosure form, so Pam is off the hook.
d. Pam could be liable if a court decides that this heating problem is something she "should have known" when conducting her visual inspection.

Answer :

peterchristian1300

Answer:

a. The buyer was responsible for making that discovery; so Pam is not liable.

Explanation:

The option "d" would have been correct if she conducted a technical (or of a sort) inspection

ogorwyne

The statement that is true about this product is that Pam could be liable if a court decides that this heating problem is something she "should have known" when conducting her visual inspection.

Why would Pam be liable for the product?

This is because as the seller she is under the law supposed to make sure that all of the products that she sells are free from defects.

The person that bought it would have gotten it in good faith because she felt it was working well.

Read more on product defects here:

https://brainly.com/question/26421253

#SPJ5

Other Questions