The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the Warren Court was related to
the right to a court-appointed attorney.
the right to remain silent after an arrest.
the use of incriminating statements.
the use of illegally

The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the Warren Court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney. the right to remain silent after an arrest. class=

Answer :

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

Parrain

1n 1961, the case of Mapp v. Ohio which came before the Warren Court was based on the use of illegally obtained evidence.

What happened in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?

This was a case that went before the Supreme Court in 1961 under Chief Justice Warren.

The Supreme Court ruled in this case that any evidence which was acquired by violating the 4th Amendment rights of a person, would not apply in state or federal courts as it would be considered to be illegally obtained.

In conclusion, option D is correct.

Find out more on Mapp v. Ohio at https://brainly.com/question/499583.

Other Questions