Answer :
Extraordinary claims can be hard to prove or test. Scientists and others shouldn’t always believe far-reaching claims because they can’t always be deemed true
Answer:
“Extraordinary” evidence is only required when it must be balanced against a very large number of contrary observations. The crux of the matter is that in order to properly characterize a claim as “extraordinary,” there must exist weighty evidence of the exact antithesis.
Explanation:
An extraordinary claim is one that is already contradicted by extraordinary evidence. Under this definition, our maxim basically says that the only way to counter evidence is with more evidence. I think that this is self-evidently true, and quite useful. For an example application, take astrology.
Hoped this helped!