Answered

An author claims that "zoos do more good than harm." The author provides the following as support for the claim:

According to a report from the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, there are 222 accredited zoos in the world. About 175 million people visit zoos each year, where about 6,000 different species are displayed.

Which choice best describes the support the author provides?

It is effective support for the claim.
It is ineffective support because it does not help prove the claim.
It is ineffective support because it presents opinion rather than fact.
It is ineffective support because it provides no source for the information.

Answer :

TDPqueen13

Answer:

It is ineffective because it does not help prove the claim.

Explanation:

It says that zoos are doing more good then harm but it doesn't give any examples of zoos doing good, only the statistics.

Hope this helped

gauravsingh23VT

It is ineffective support because it does not help prove the claim is the best describes the support the author provides. Hence, option B is correct.

What is the support for a claim?

When making a claim, it's crucial to include all the evidence that supports it; otherwise, the claim is useless. The author makes the case that zoos help save many species from extinction and other negative effects.

He also lists two animal species that, without the care of zoos, would become extinct. The issue is that the lack of a reliable source of information to support the assertion renders the support ineffective.

It should be emphasized that when writing, it's crucial to use reliable sources and make sure the assertion is backed up by evidence. Because it does not contribute to proving the claim, the author's support in this instance is insufficient. The represented numbers are different.

Thus, option B is correct.

For more details about support for a claim, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2584421

#SPJ5

Other Questions