Answer :
Answer:
academic discourse, which requires argumentation and debate. Argumentation and debate inevitably lend themselves to flawed reasoning and rhetorical errors. Many of these errors are considered logical fallacies.
The statements about moral issues that reference two different logical fallacies are
"Academic discourse, which requires argumentation and debate. Argumentation and debate inevitably lend themselves to flawed reasoning and rhetorical errors. Many of these errors are considered logical fallacies."
What are Logical fallacies?
A logical fallacy is an error in reasoning that lessens the force and persuasiveness of your argument. These flaws make you want to be able to see them in other people's arguments (and your own) so you can correct them or call them out.
There are two major types of logical fallacy, formal and informal.
There will be a problem with the way your argument is put together and how you are presenting your ideas in a formal logical fallacy. Despite the fact that you may be expressing the truth, the manner you are putting your arguments together causes the logic to fall apart.
There will be an issue with what you're expressing in an informal logical error, and the information may be false or deceptive.
What is academic discourse?
Good academic discourse is a designed control for students since it encompasses the idea of dialogue, from the language used by students to the facilitation of communication in the classroom.
"Encouraging higher levels of communication, in anything from whole class discussions to peer-to-peer communication, can help students to improve their problem-based learning"
To learn more about logical fallacy here,
https://brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ2