Answered

What is the most significant limitation that carl schurz’s work has as a resource for a historian? schurz was too young to be a reliable witness. schurz was not an eyewitness to the events he describes. schurz wrote his account about fifty years after the events occurred. schurz was a government official and likely biased against the revolution.

Answer :

The fact that Carl Schurz published his story around fifty years after the events took place is the most important drawback to his work as a source for a historian.

A good eyewitness account requires writing about events as they happen, therefore this was a significant constraint. The accounts are typically more accurate and in-depth when events are documented according to how they actually occur.

For what is Carl Schurz renowned?

  • Carl Schurz was a soldier, politician, and author who is most known for his ardent advocacy of liberal democracy.
  • He was a U.S. Senator, participated in the Civil War, supported Abraham Lincoln's election, and opposed the Republican Party's turn to conservatism in the late 19th century.
  • In addition to being an American statesman, journalist, and reformer, Carl Schurz was a German revolutionary.
  • After the 1848–1849 German uprisings, he emigrated to the United States, where he rose to prominence in the fledgling Republican Party.

To learn more about Carl Schurz, refer to the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/28338934

#SPJ4

Other Questions